Wednesday 30 March 2016

Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice Spoiler-Free Review

Superman may be bullet proof, but can he survive the wrath of the critics?


Picture this: You’re a middle aged man struggling through PTSD and depression. Your parents were murdered in cold blood by a lone gunman on what could have been the happiest night of your childhood. The only solid rock in your life is your foreign butler. You must continuously balance owning Gotham’s most influential corporation with keeping the crime level at bay with your own brute force. Everything has been taken from you. Your home. Your friends. Your family.
One day, something appears in the sky. It’s a man, and while fighting off beings of immeasurable power he litters the mega city of Metropolis with the bodies of employees you promised to protect. People fall from buildings and crash into the dust and smoke that lines the city floor. Children are orphaned, friends lose their legs, and buildings crumble to the ground like sand being poured from a child’s plastic bucket. A machine the size of the Chrysler Building is hovering over the city centre, and its destructive power is ebbing ever closer to the tower you own. In a matter of seconds, the man smashes into it, and your building falls to the ground like an empty water bottle.


There is another machine that the news is calling a world engine hovering over the Indian Ocean eradicating the very presence of life in the area. There are beings whose eyes alone have the power to melt steel and fly as fast as the speed of sound. Even the Police force have abandoned hope. There is nothing you can do to help protect anyone at all, and, suddenly, your world of crime and clowns and capes doesn't seem as big as it used to.

It is easy to understand why Bruce Wayne detests the very idea of Superman – his very title seemingly mocking the futility of the American citizens who perished as a result of his untrained combat through the skyline of the world’s biggest city. Set up at the very beginning of the film, Batman’s story is one that has been acclaimed by fans and critics alike for decades, and director Zack Snyder’s take on the character isn't by any means a disservice to the legend. Despite fan’s backlash when the casting of Ben Affleck was announced, his portrayal of the Dark Knight is arguably one of the films many pinnacles, and seeing Batman’s first comic-accurate(ish) portrayal on the silver screen is worth your money alone.


Talking of pinnacles, the star of this show is unquestionably its action. Snyder – no stranger to an action sequence (see Watchmen, Man of Steel, 300) – is absolutely breath-taking as he crafts sequences of such beauty, such grandeur that an audience member cannot help but grin. What makes these experiences even better is the inclusion of the world’s most iconic characters. Wonder Woman, Batman, Superman, Lois Lane and more all take part in heart-thumping scenes that are quite honestly mesmerizing, and to see DC’s trinity battle it out on an IMAX screen with such finesse was one of the best cinematic experiences of my life.

Unfortunately for Batman V Superman though, every step forward that the film took was followed by a leap backwards. My main issue with Dawn of Justice is its lack of focus. It seems as though Terrio (see ARGO) and Snyder were so intent in powering through the timeline of the DC Extended Universe that it forgot to create a universally enjoyable, accessible motion picture. In the space of two hours, viewers are confronted with a confusing array of scenes. One moment you’re watching Clark and Lois make love in a bath and the next you’re living through a bizarre, unexplained flash-forward sequence that has no relevance or purpose in the rest of the movie. Ultimately, it feels as if half of the film was left cut on the editing room floor, and the only pieces that remained were scenes that simply don’t make sense without explanation. The film cuts from Metropolis to Gotham so quickly and so often that you regularly miss the first minute of a scene while working out when, where and how the events before you are taking place. Hopefully these issues will be solved with the already-announced, three hour long director’s cut (soon to be released online and on blu-ray), but for now, Batman V Superman is simply too inaccessible to the 'average Joe' for it to stand as the masterpiece it had the potential to be.


Don’t get me wrong, though. The film itself was, in my opinion, wonderful. The film’s script did explore the fascinating war of ideologies that fuelled the super conflict in the film’s third act, and the courtroom scenes and news segments littered throughout the film were not only a touching homage to Frank Miller's ‘The Dark Knight Returns’ (the graphic novel on which this film was loosely based) but a fascinating insight into the political debates that would surely occur should our own world encounter a being such as Superman. There were some truly beautiful lines here, such as “Ignorance is not innocence” and “How would you react if your child was murdered and Superman could have saved him but the Government didn’t deem it appropriate?”, forcing the viewing audience to question their own philosophies. It is this intellectual take on the comic book genre that makes Batman V Superman as interesting and as powerful as it (just) manages to be.

One aspect of the film that was truly exciting was the so-called ‘Dawn of Justice’. The reveal of Wonder Woman was as epic and awesome as you would hope, and though Gal Gadot’s casting as Diana Prince initially split fans it is safe to say that the level of anticipation for 2017's ‘Wonder Woman’ just sky-rocketed. While staying spoiler-free, I can say that The Flash was stunning, and his very small role did indeed get me excited for Ezra Miller’s take on the red blur. Not much can be said for Cyborg, whose cameo was disappointingly underwhelming (and quite honestly confusing), but Aquaman (Jason Momoa of Game of Thrones fame) was stunning and surprisingly intimidating.


Most polarising of all, however, was Jesse Eisenberg’s portrayal of Lex Luthor. The decision to make the evil-overlord a young, Zuckerberg-esque character was an interesting one, but Eisenberg’s portrayal seemed disappointingly two-dimensional. Though glimmers of wonder could be found in his performance, and despite the fact that Luthor’s terrifying menace penetrated the entire film (Peach Tea anyone?), Batman V Superman simply cannot afford to include such a cartoon-y character in a universe it has worked so hard to make as realistic and gritty as Nolan’s own Dark Knight adaptations. Hopefully, the character will develop to become one with much more gravitas in future films.

Though the movie never managed to reach the heights of Man of Steel, a film I adore, Batman V Superman by no means deserves the vendetta it seems to have inspired from the critics of traditional media. Though the film may seem inaccessible to a non-comic book fan, people with a basic understanding of the Justice League and its many characters will understand and enjoy a vast majority of this film. Despite clunky storytelling and confusing segments, Batman V Superman is one of the most intellectual blockbusters of recent years, and with the introduction of Wonder Woman being as strong as it was I cannot wait to see what the future holds for Warner Bros’ DC Universe.

7  .  0
OUT  OF  TEN                                                                                                               Reviewed by James Green

No comments:

Post a Comment